Automation bias in public administration – an interdisciplinary perspective from law and psychology

Synopsis

Interdisciplinary law-and-psychology analysis arguing the dichotomy between "fully automated" and "human" decisions is untenable; connects automation-bias evidence to legal assumptions about human oversight in public-sector hybrid decisions.

Keywords

·automation bias ·public administration ·law and psychology ·interdisciplinary ·oversight

Related entries

• The Deskilling Effect: Is Artificial Intelligence Eroding Clinical Competence?
  June 2, 2026 · Annals of Internal Medicine 2026
• Agentic AI in the Software Development Lifecycle
  April 29, 2026 · arXiv
• Human Control Is the Anchor, Not the Answer: Early Divergence of Oversight in Agentic AI Communities
  February 10, 2026 · arXiv
• In ChatGPT they trust: a study of students' perceptions and misuse of ChatGPT in higher education
  December 1, 2025 · AI and Ethics 2025
• Human-AI experience in integrated development environments: a systematic literature review
  March 8, 2025 · Empirical Software Engineering 2026
• The effects of explanations on automation bias
  September 2023 · Artificial Intelligence 2023