Strategic Algorithmic Monoculture: Experimental Evidence from Coordination Games

Synopsis

Distinguishes "primary algorithmic monoculture" (baseline action similarity) from "strategic algorithmic monoculture" (similarity adjusted by incentives). LLMs coordinate well on similar actions but lag humans in sustaining heterogeneity when divergence is rewarded.

Keywords

·monoculture ·LLM coordination ·strategic similarity ·coordination games

Related entries

• Monoculture or Multiplicity: Which Is It?
  September 18, 2025 · NeurIPS 2025
• Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents
  February 19, 2026 · arXiv
• When Stereotypes GTG: The Impact of Predictive Text Suggestions on Gender Bias in Human-AI Co-Writing
  September 30, 2024 · CHI 2026
• Homogenizing effect of large language models (LLMs) on creative diversity: An empirical comparison of human and ChatGPT writing
  September 2024 · ScienceDirect 2025
• Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?
  September 11, 2023 · ICLR 2024