Human-Robo-advisor collaboration in decision-making: Evidence from a multiphase mixed methods experimental study

Synopsis

Multiphase mixed-methods study (behavioural experiment n=334 + thematic analysis + follow-up testing) of human reliance on robo-advisors; finds reliance is shaped by performance information and gain/loss framing, with four user types and three RA roles.

Keywords

·robo-advisor ·decision-making ·reliance ·mixed methods ·financial advice

Related entries

• Debugging with an AI Tutor: Investigating Novice Help-seeking Behaviors and Perceived Learning
  August 13, 2024 · ICER 2024
• Human-AI Collaboration in Software Development: A Mixed-Methods Study of Developers' Use of GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT
  2025 · FSE Companion 2025
• Barriers to AI Adoption: Image Concerns at Work
  November 23, 2025 · arXiv
• In GenAI we trust: An investigation of university students' reliance on and resistance to generative AI in language learning
  August 20, 2025 · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2025
• Complementarity in Human-AI Collaboration: Concept, Sources, and Evidence
  March 21, 2024 · European Journal of Information Systems 2025
• Examining University Students' Engagement with ChatGPT in English Essay Writing: Interaction Patterns and Perceptions
  2026 · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 2026