Entry
The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI
Lev Tankelevitch, Viktor Kewenig, Auste Simkute, Ava Elizabeth Scott, Advait Sarkar, Abigail Sellen, Sean Rintel
Argues that GenAI imposes metacognitive demands across prompting, output evaluation, and workflow integration — and that metacognition (monitor + control) is the right design lens to address overreliance. Recommends embedding metacognitive scaffolding into GenAI through enhanced explainability and customizability. Best Paper at CHI 2024.
·metacognition ·self-regulation ·prompt formulation ·confidence calibration ·overreliance
- Boosting Metacognition in Entangled Human-AI Interaction to Navigate Cognitive-Behavioral DriftFebruary 2, 2026 · arXiv
- Understanding, Protecting, and Augmenting Human Cognition with Generative AI: A Synthesis of the CHI 2025 Tools for Thought WorkshopAugust 28, 2025 · arXiv
- Trust and reliance on AI — An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI2024 · Computers in Human Behavior 2024